Lads I have contacted the Royal Navy Fleet Air Arm Museum and I have asked them how many kills the Royal Navy Sea Harriers achieved during the Falklands War using the VIFF(ing) method. As soon as I get an answer I will post it.
Thanks
Phil
- You are at: Home » Board index » Eurofighter Typhoon » General Discussion
Eurofihgter weakness
RE
by toan on 10 Jul 2003 14:44
I believe that 6500 kg is the usual external loading limit for EF-2000 if you want your fighter to have an ideal long-term structural life. But if you don't care the structural life of EF-2000, the maximum loading of its designer's aim is about 7500 kg or more.
- toan
by Phil Foster on 10 Jul 2003 15:09
Too many words, man!
I see you have many emotions.
Instead posting so long text, you'll better find some pictures with 8 tonn bomb load under EF.
I never seen these pictures in internet.
I had a questions about EF-2000 and I posted there.
Instead clear answear, I got from you....
If you cant give me that answer at my questions, shut up - and dont bother me with you stupid long senseless posting.
Just write " I dont know".
Is this short enough for you?
Shut your mouth you prat. Stop typing *beep*. We are getting bored.
Phil
- Phil Foster
by Scorpion on 10 Jul 2003 20:45
At first Phil and Sergey coll down!
In the last year things changed. You see the empty weight of the Typhoon isn't anymore 9750 kg it's now 11150 kg, the maximum takeoff weight rised from 21000 kg to 23500 kg, also the possible max. payload rised to 7500 kg, that's due to the required multirole capabilities. The required service life of the Typhoon airframe is 6000 h. But 18000 h were proved.
In the last year things changed. You see the empty weight of the Typhoon isn't anymore 9750 kg it's now 11150 kg, the maximum takeoff weight rised from 21000 kg to 23500 kg, also the possible max. payload rised to 7500 kg, that's due to the required multirole capabilities. The required service life of the Typhoon airframe is 6000 h. But 18000 h were proved.
-
Scorpion - Part of the furniture
- Posts: 887
- Joined: 20 Jan 2002 11:39
- Location: Germany
by Scorpion on 10 Jul 2003 20:46
For example, max weight of bombs of F-15C\D - some great digit, 7 or 8 tonnes, BUT on paper. In reality, F-15C\D in USAF dont use bombs, only missles.
Did you ever see a Su-27P/S Flanker B with a payload of 6000 kg? Probably not. It's possible, but it's unlikely since this aircraft is also used as fighter.
-
Scorpion - Part of the furniture
- Posts: 887
- Joined: 20 Jan 2002 11:39
- Location: Germany
Oh dear!
by Zen on 10 Jul 2003 23:10
Its "Suck my cock you(or yah if you prefer american) stupid whore" Sergey, do at least get your swearing in english right. BTW 'bite me' is just as effective these days or even just 'suck you bitch'.
BTW the more sublte the put down the more effective generally it is, perhaps you should be a little more poetic in your insults and less crude.
"great flight restrictions with heavy load, because of these, aircraft loose turnability, speed, stability, and other flight perfomances. "
Indeed I expect no better than 5 G with subsonci drop tanks and bombs.
But most aircraft use guided missiles or bombs these days for ground attack as they assure better accuracy per weapon.
BTW the more sublte the put down the more effective generally it is, perhaps you should be a little more poetic in your insults and less crude.
"great flight restrictions with heavy load, because of these, aircraft loose turnability, speed, stability, and other flight perfomances. "
Indeed I expect no better than 5 G with subsonci drop tanks and bombs.
But most aircraft use guided missiles or bombs these days for ground attack as they assure better accuracy per weapon.
to win without fighting that is the mastery of war
- Zen
- Part of the furniture
- Posts: 326
- Joined: 19 Jul 2002 14:16
- Location: England
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], TMor and 2 guests